← Back to Countries
🇦🇺 Australia  ·  7 min read  ·  Published 2026-06-19  ·  Updated 2026-06-19
Last fact-checked: 2026-06-19

Downsizer Contributions: Up to $300,000 Into Super

From age 55, you can put up to $300,000 each — $600,000 for a couple — from selling your home into super, completely outside the normal contribution caps. It's a rare chance to move a large sum into the low-tax super environment, with one trade-off worth understanding.

60-SECOND ANSWER
Up to $300,000 per person from a home sale into super, outside the caps, from age 55.

Cass's parents sold the family home they'd owned for 30 years. Between them they could move $600,000 of the proceeds into super — but it changed their Age Pension, so we ran both sides before deciding.

01 What a downsizer contribution is

A downsizer contribution lets each member of a couple aged 55 or over contribute up to $300,000 from the proceeds of selling their main residence into super — $600,000 combined. The home must have been owned for at least 10 years, and the contribution must be made within 90 days of settlement. Crucially, it sits outside the normal concessional and non-concessional caps, so it's available even if you've used those up or your balance is too high to contribute normally.

WORKED EXAMPLE · Try the numbers

Shows: how much of your home-sale proceeds can go into super as a downsizer contribution. Ignores: the 10-year ownership test, the 90-day contribution window, that it counts as an asset for the Age Pension, and that it does not count toward the contribution caps.

Downsizer contribution capacity
$600,000
Each eligible owner aged 55+ can contribute up to $300,000 from the proceeds — $600,000 for 2 — without using the contribution caps.

On the defaults above, the worked example shows: Each eligible owner aged 55+ can contribute up to $300,000 from the proceeds — $600,000 for 2 — without using the contribution caps.

Source: ATO — Downsizer super contributions

02 You don't actually have to downsize

Despite the name, there is no requirement to buy a cheaper home, or any home at all. You can sell and rent, move in with family, or buy something more expensive; the contribution only has to come from the proceeds of selling an eligible main residence.

That flexibility is what makes it useful to people restructuring their living situation in later life rather than only those trading down. Selling a large family home to move into an apartment near adult children qualifies. So does selling up to travel, or to move into a retirement village, or to fund a move interstate.

It can only be used once in your lifetime, which turns it into a decision about which sale to use it on rather than whether to use it. Someone who expects to sell a house at 60 and again at 75 has to pick. Because the cap is a flat $300,000 per person regardless of the sale price, the sensible answer is usually the first sale that generates at least $300,000 of proceeds each — using it on a smaller sale wastes the difference permanently.

The name causes the single most common misunderstanding in this area: people assume they must buy something smaller and cheaper to qualify, and many rule themselves out on that basis. The rule contains no such requirement. What is required is the sale of an eligible main residence held for ten years — what you do next is irrelevant to eligibility, and buying a more expensive home still qualifies.

Source: ATO — Downsizer super contributions

03 The Age Pension trade-off

This is the part people miss, and it is the difference between the strategy being excellent and being a mistake. Your home is exempt from the Age Pension assets test. Super in your name is fully assessable.

Moving $300,000 out of an exempt asset and into an assessable one can therefore reduce or remove a part Age Pension through the assets taper, which cuts the payment by $3 per fortnight for every $1,000 of assessable assets above the threshold. On $300,000 that is up to $900 a fortnight, or roughly $23,400 a year of pension — considerably more than the tax advantage of holding the money in super is worth.

The result is a clean split by circumstance. For a self-funded retiree already above the assets cut-off, there is no pension to lose and the move is straightforwardly good: money leaves a non-earning asset and enters a concessionally taxed one. For someone on a part pension, the pension lost usually exceeds the tax saved, and the contribution can leave them materially worse off. For a full pensioner, it can end the pension entirely.

The decision therefore is not about super at all. It is about which side of the assets cut-off you are on, and it should be modelled with your actual numbers before settlement, not after.

Source: Services Australia — Assets test for Age Pension

04 Eligibility and the 90-day clock

The rules are specific, and missing one disqualifies the contribution. You must be 55 or over at the time you contribute; the home must have been owned by you or your spouse for at least 10 years and have qualified for at least a partial main-residence CGT exemption; and the contribution must be made within 90 days of receiving the sale proceeds (usually settlement). You complete a downsizer contribution form for your fund at or before the time you contribute. Only one home sale can ever be used, and the cap is $300,000 per person regardless of how the home was owned, capped at your share of the actual proceeds. Get the form and the 90-day timing right — there's no discretion to extend it casually.

Source: ATO — Downsizer eligibility

05 Who it suits

Downsizer contributions suit retirees who have sold a long-held home and want more of the proceeds inside the low-tax super system — especially those already above the Age Pension assets cut-off, who lose no pension by making the move.

They suit part-pensioners much less. The assets-test impact frequently outweighs the tax benefit, and the contribution is irreversible: once the money is in super it is assessable, and taking it back out does not restore the home exemption because you no longer own the home. Model the pension effect before you contribute, not after.

Three practical points for anyone proceeding. The 90-day clock runs from settlement, not from listing or exchange, and it is not extended for a slow fund — start the paperwork with your super fund before settlement rather than after. The downsizer form must reach the fund at or before the time you contribute, and a contribution made without it is treated as an ordinary non-concessional contribution, which may breach your cap. And if the home was owned by one spouse only, both partners can still contribute their $300,000 each, provided the other requirements are met — the ownership test looks at the couple, not the individual.

Source: ATO — Downsizer super contributions

The downsizer contribution is genuinely useful — $600,000 into super for a couple, no caps — but the name oversells the simplicity. The real decision is the means test: you're moving money from an exempt asset to an assessable one. For self-funded retirees above the assets cut-off, do it without a second thought. For part-pensioners, run the taper first; the pension you'd give up can outweigh the tax you'd save. Don't let 'free of the caps' rush the call.

— Jordan Reeves, founder

FAQ

How much can I contribute as a downsizer contribution?

Up to $300,000 per person — $600,000 for a couple — from the proceeds of selling your main residence, outside the normal contribution caps.

Do I have to be over 65 for a downsizer contribution?

No — the minimum age is 55. You must have owned the home for at least 10 years and contribute within 90 days of settlement.

Do I have to buy a smaller home?

No. There's no requirement to buy another home at all; you can rent, move in with family, or buy something more expensive. The contribution just comes from the sale proceeds.

Does a downsizer contribution affect my Age Pension?

It can. Your home is exempt from the assets test, but super is assessable, so moving proceeds into super can reduce a part Age Pension via the assets taper.

Sources

Regulator references

Calculator unit tests · the assertions this page's worked example is checked against, and their last result

Changelog

Model this trade-off against your actual numbers

Run the strategy against your real super, income and timeline — month by month.

Join the Waitlist
Jordan Reeves

Jordan Reeves

Founder of Talk Through Wealth. A software engineer for over a decade before turning to retirement planning, Jordan built the projection engine after watching family members get fragmented, country-by-country advice that never reconciled. He writes about retirement the way the engine computes it: month-by-month, lifetime-long, and skeptical of any rule of thumb that hasn't been run through the math.

More from Jordan → · LinkedIn

Disclaimer: General information for Australian residents, not personal financial advice. Figures use 2024-25 rules and assumptions you can change in the worked example. Your situation may vary — consider speaking with a licensed financial adviser before acting.