← Back to Countries
🇦🇺 Australia  ·  4 min read  ·  Published 2026-09-07  ·  Updated 2026-09-07
Sources last verified: 2026-09-07

The Means-Test Concession on Guaranteed Income Streams

A lifetime annuity converts capital into an income you cannot outlive, and Australia gives complying lifetime income streams concessional treatment under both Age Pension means tests. Only part of the purchase price counts as an asset and only part of the income is assessed, which can raise the Age Pension by enough to matter — and is bought with the loss of access to the capital.

60-SECOND ANSWER
Part of the capital is counted and part of the income is assessed. The concession is real; the capital is gone.

Where the AI summary above gets this wrong

"Annuities are a poor deal because you lose your capital and the returns are low."

That's surface-true. Here's what it misses:

See what the means-test concession is worth

Take a retiree deciding whether to put a quarter of their super into a lifetime annuity — a composite of a decision that is offered to almost everyone and taken by very few. The concession changes the arithmetic in a way the product brochures usually lead with and the alternatives never mention.

01 What a lifetime annuity does

You hand a lump sum to a provider and receive a payment for life, regardless of how long you live and regardless of what markets do. The provider pools the risk across many purchasers, which is why they can offer a payment higher than a sustainable withdrawal from the same capital.

The payment can be level, or indexed to inflation or to a fixed rate. Indexation costs a lower starting payment and protects the later decades, and over a thirty-year retirement the difference is substantial.

Most products offer a withdrawal period during which some capital can be returned, declining to nil over time, and a death benefit period during which a portion is paid to your estate. Those features reduce the payment.

None of this is an investment in the ordinary sense. It is insurance against living a long time, and the return on it is set entirely by how long you live — which is the point.

Source: ASIC Moneysmart — Annuities

02 The means-test concession

Under the assets test, only a proportion of the purchase price of a complying lifetime income stream is assessed, and that proportion reduces at a specified age. Under the income test, only a proportion of the payments is counted.

For a part-pensioner near the assets threshold, having part of the capital removed from the assessment can raise the Age Pension by an amount that changes the whole comparison — at the taper in the assets taper reference, each $100,000 taken out of the assessment is worth $7,800 a year.

That concession does not exist for an account-based pension, where the whole balance is assessed. It is a deliberate policy choice intended to encourage guaranteed income products, and it is the main financial argument for them.

For someone well above the pension cut-off the concession is worth nothing, and the decision reverts to a pure comparison between guaranteed income and a managed portfolio.

WORKED EXAMPLE · Try the numbers

Shows: the Age Pension gained from the assets test concession on a complying lifetime income stream, against the same capital held in an account-based pension where all of it is assessed. Ignores: the income test concession, which works the same way, the annuity payment itself, the loss of access to capital, and the maximum payment rate that caps any increase.

Extra Age Pension from the concession each year
$9,360
Of $300,000 used to buy the income stream, $120,000 is outside the assets test, which is worth $9,360 a year of extra Age Pension at the current taper.

Source: Services Australia — Income test for Age Pension

03 What you give up

Access to the capital is the main cost. Beyond any withdrawal period, the money cannot be recovered for an emergency, an aged care deposit or a change of plan, and that inflexibility is permanent.

The estate is the second. A lifetime annuity with no death benefit pays nothing to your beneficiaries after your death, which for a household intending to leave an inheritance is a real reduction.

Counterparty risk is the third, though it is modest: annuities are issued by regulated life companies subject to prudential capital requirements. It is not zero, and concentration in one provider is worth avoiding for a large purchase.

The fourth is that the payment is set at purchase against prevailing rates. Buying when long-term rates are low locks in a lower payment for life, which is an argument for staging purchases rather than making one.

Source: ASIC Moneysmart — Annuities

04 How much, and when

The useful framing is the floor. Work out the annual income you want guaranteed for life, subtract the Age Pension you expect, and the remainder is what an annuity would need to cover — which is usually a much smaller share of the balance than the products are marketed at.

Deferring the start is the other lever. A deferred lifetime annuity bought at 65 and starting at 80 costs far less than one starting immediately, because the provider is only insuring the years most people do not reach.

That structure matches the risk. The years that break a retirement plan are the ones past the planning horizon, and insuring only those is cheaper than insuring all of them — the problem is set out in the longevity risk post.

Staging the purchase across several years reduces the interest rate timing risk, in the same way as staging any large irreversible transaction.

Source: ASIC Moneysmart — Retirement income

05 What I would actually do

Calculate the Age Pension first, at your current assets and at half of them. That establishes the floor you already have, which for many Australian households is most of the floor they need.

Then size any annuity to the gap between that floor and the income you would find unacceptable to fall below. That is a much smaller number than a percentage of the portfolio.

Prefer an indexed payment over a level one if the term is long. A level payment looks better for the first decade and is materially worse by the third, and the third is the one the annuity exists for.

And treat the means-test concession as a genuine part of the return rather than a marketing point. For a part-pensioner it frequently is the largest component, and for a self-funded retiree it is worth nothing at all.

Source: Services Australia — Assets test for Age Pension

Annuities get dismissed on the return and bought on the fear, and both of those miss the point. The thing worth calculating is the means-test concession, because for a part-pensioner it is frequently larger than the difference in investment return — and for a self-funded retiree it is zero, which is why the same product is a good idea for one household and not the other.

— Jordan Reeves, founder

FAQ

How is a lifetime annuity assessed under the Age Pension income and assets tests?

Concessionally. Only a proportion of the purchase price is counted as an asset, reducing further at a specified age, and only a proportion of the payments is counted as income. An account-based pension has its whole balance assessed.

What proportion of my super should I put into an annuity versus an account-based pension?

Size it to the gap between the Age Pension you expect and the income you would find unacceptable to fall below. That is usually a much smaller share of the balance than the products are marketed at.

Should I buy a deferred lifetime annuity?

It is cheaper than an immediate one because the provider only insures the later years, and it matches the risk more precisely — the years that break a plan are the ones past the planning horizon.

What do I give up by buying a lifetime annuity?

Access to the capital beyond any withdrawal period, most of the estate value of that money, and the flexibility to change your mind. The payment is also fixed at purchase against prevailing rates.

Sources

Regulator references

Calculator unit tests · the assertions this page's worked example is checked against, and their last result

Changelog

Model this trade-off against your actual numbers

Run the strategy against your real super, income and timeline — month by month.

Join the Waitlist
Jordan Reeves

Jordan Reeves

Founder of Talk Through Wealth. A software engineer for over a decade before turning to retirement planning, Jordan built the projection engine after watching family members get fragmented, country-by-country advice that never reconciled. He writes about retirement the way the engine computes it: month-by-month, lifetime-long, and skeptical of any rule of thumb that hasn't been run through the math.

More from Jordan → · LinkedIn

Disclaimer: General information for Australian residents, not personal financial advice. Figures use 2026-27 rules and assumptions you can change in the worked example. Your situation may vary — consider speaking with a licensed financial adviser before acting.