โ† Back to Countries
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia 7 min read

The True Impact of Super Fees: 0.5% Over 30 Years

Super fees feel small on a fund's PDS โ€” 0.6%, 1.1%, what's the difference, really? But the maths gets uncomfortable when you stretch it across a 30-year career. That extra 0.5% can quietly walk off with more than $130,000 of your retirement.

Watch the Walkthrough

What "Super Fees" Actually Cover

Most super funds don't have one fee โ€” they have a stack. APRA breaks them into three buckets: administration fees (running the fund), investment fees (managing the underlying assets), and transaction costs (buying and selling investments). Some funds charge a flat dollar amount on top of percentage fees, which hits smaller balances harder.

The headline number you usually see quoted is the total ongoing cost, expressed as a percentage of your balance. For a typical balanced option, that might range from about 0.6% at a low-cost industry fund to 1.1% or more at a retail fund with active management. The gap looks tiny โ€” but fees don't compound in your favour. They compound against you, every year, for as long as the money sits there.

Why it hurts: Every dollar paid in fees is a dollar that's no longer earning returns. And because super grows over decades, the lost returns on those lost dollars stack up. It's compounding in reverse.

A 35-Year Comparison

Let's run the numbers on Liam, a 30-year-old graphic designer in Brisbane earning $85,000. He's got $30,000 in super already and is choosing between two funds with identical balanced investment options. Both funds aim for the same gross return of 7% per year. The only difference is the total fee:

Detail Industry Fund Retail Fund
Total fees 0.60% 1.10%
Net return 6.40% 5.90%
Balance at age 65 ~$1.25 million ~$1.12 million
Difference ~$130,000

Both funds receive the same Super Guarantee contributions from Liam's employer (currently 11.5%, rising to 12% from July 2025). Both have the same investment strategy. Same starting balance. The only thing that changes is the fee โ€” and 35 years later, that gap is bigger than the median Australian's annual salary.

Example: The 30-Year Damage

Year 1: The fee gap is about $200. Barely noticeable.

Year 10: Liam's balance is around $200,000 in either fund. The annual fee gap is about $1,000 โ€” still tolerable.

Year 25: The retail fund balance is now $80,000 behind, and the annual fee gap is over $4,500.

Year 35 (age 65): Liam is $130,000 behind. That's roughly 4 to 5 years of comfortable retirement income gone, before he ever drew a cent.

Why the Gap Grows So Fast

Two things make the late years brutal. First, the balance is largest, so a percentage fee takes the biggest dollar bite right when you can least afford it. Second, every dollar of fee paid is also a dollar that misses out on its own future compounding. The "lost returns on lost dollars" effect is what turns a small percentage gap into a six-figure one.

Have a play with the calculator and shift the fee number by even 0.2%. You'll see the curve bend. It's exactly the same physics as compound growth โ€” just running in the wrong direction.

Where Australian Funds Sit

The good news is fees in Australia have fallen sharply over the last decade, partly thanks to APRA's annual MySuper performance test, which calls out underperformers and high-cost duds. Most large industry funds now sit in the 0.6%โ€“0.9% range for a balanced option. Many retail funds have followed them down. But there are still plenty of legacy products charging 1.5% or more โ€” often older corporate funds, advised products with platform fees, or actively managed retail options.

Check your fund: Your annual super statement and the fund's PDS both list the total cost. The ATO's YourSuper comparison tool also shows fees side-by-side for MySuper products. Worth a five-minute look every couple of years.

Cheap Isn't Always Best โ€” But Expensive Is Rarely Worth It

Lower fees don't automatically mean a better fund. A 0.5% fund that consistently underperforms the market by 1% is worse than a 1.0% fund that matches the index. What matters is net return โ€” return after fees and tax โ€” over a full market cycle.

That said, decades of research from APRA, ASIC's MoneySmart, and academic studies all point in the same direction: high fees are a strong predictor of underperformance, especially over long horizons. Active funds promising market-beating returns rarely deliver them consistently after their fees are taken out. So while you shouldn't pick on price alone, paying premium fees for ordinary returns is the worst combination going.

Things Worth Looking At

What Talk Through Wealth Shows You

The fee number on your statement is abstract. Talk Through Wealth turns it into the dollar figure you'll actually feel:

Once you can see the curve, the decision usually makes itself.

See What Your Fees Are Really Costing

Project the long-term impact of your current super fees and compare alternatives.

Join the Waitlist
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is general in nature. The figures are illustrative projections using a hypothetical 7% gross return and current Super Guarantee rates; actual returns and fees vary by fund, market conditions, and individual circumstances. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance. Consider speaking with a licensed financial adviser before making decisions about your super.