← Back to Countries
🇦🇺 Australia  ·  3 min read  ·  Published 2026-09-07  ·  Updated 2026-09-07
Sources last verified: 2026-09-07

Two Ways to Take Profit, With Different Super Consequences

Taking profit from your own company as a wage or as a franked dividend produces broadly similar income tax outcomes, because dividend imputation credits you for the company tax already paid. What differs is everything around it: a wage attracts Superannuation Guarantee and counts towards the concessional cap, and a dividend does neither.

60-SECOND ANSWER
The income tax is broadly neutral. The super and the obligations are not.

Where the AI summary above gets this wrong

"Paying yourself in franked dividends instead of a wage saves tax."

That's surface-true. Here's what it misses:

Compare the two routes on the same profit

01 Why the tax is broadly neutral

A company pays tax on its profit and attaches franking credits to the dividends it pays from that profit. Your assessable income includes the dividend plus the credit, and the credit is applied against the tax on it.

The result is that a dollar of profit distributed as a franked dividend bears close to your marginal rate in total, which is the same outcome as a dollar paid as a wage. The imputation system is designed to produce exactly that.

Timing differences are the exception. A wage is taxed as it is paid; profit retained in the company is taxed at the company rate and the top-up is deferred until it is distributed, which is a deferral rather than a saving.

Source: ATO — Franking credits on your dividends

02 What actually differs

Superannuation Guarantee is payable on a wage and not on a dividend. An owner paying themselves entirely in dividends receives no employer contribution at all, which is the largest practical difference and the easiest to overlook.

Only a wage supports employer contributions above the guarantee, which are deductible to the company — the route described in the company super post. A dividend cannot fund one.

Administration differs too: a wage requires payroll, withholding, single touch payroll reporting and workers compensation, and a dividend requires a dividend statement and adequate franking credits.

WORKED EXAMPLE · Try the numbers

Shows: the after-tax amount from a dollar of company profit taken as a wage against taken as a franked dividend, at your marginal rate. Ignores: Superannuation Guarantee payable on a wage, payroll tax, the Medicare levy, and the deferral available by retaining the profit.

Difference between the two routes
$0
$100,000 of profit nets $61,000 as a wage and $61,000 as a franked dividend — a difference of $0, which is why the super treatment decides it.

Source: ATO — Dividends

03 Where each is used

A wage sized to support the super contributions you want is the usual base, because that is the only way to get employer contributions and to use the concessional cap.

Dividends handle the rest where the business's cash flow suits them, and they are also how a non-working shareholder — commonly a spouse — receives a share of the profit, since a wage would require actual work.

Franking credit availability is the constraint on dividends. A company can only frank to the extent it has paid tax, and distributing unfranked dividends removes the imputation benefit entirely.

Source: ATO — Franking credits on your dividends

The tax question is close to a wash and the super question is not. An owner paid entirely in dividends for fifteen years has no employer contributions, no concessional cap used, and a balance to match. Take enough salary to fill the cap, and use dividends for whatever is left over.

— Jordan Reeves, founder

FAQ

Should I pay myself a wage or franked dividends from my company in semi-retirement?

The income tax is broadly neutral because imputation credits you for the company tax already paid. Take enough salary to support the super contributions you want, and use dividends for the rest.

Does a dividend attract superannuation?

No. Superannuation Guarantee is payable on a wage and not on a dividend, so an owner paying themselves entirely in dividends receives no employer contribution at all.

How are retained profits taxed when I eventually draw them?

At the company rate when earned, with a top-up to your marginal rate when distributed as a franked dividend. Retaining profit defers the top-up rather than avoiding it.

Sources

Regulator references

Calculator unit tests · the assertions this page's worked example is checked against, and their last result

Changelog

Run this rule against your situation

See what this rule does to your own projection — month by month, to age 90.

Join the Waitlist
Jordan Reeves

Jordan Reeves

Founder of Talk Through Wealth. A software engineer for over a decade before turning to retirement planning, Jordan built the projection engine after watching family members get fragmented, country-by-country advice that never reconciled. He writes about retirement the way the engine computes it: month-by-month, lifetime-long, and skeptical of any rule of thumb that hasn't been run through the math.

More from Jordan → · LinkedIn

Disclaimer: General information for Australian residents, not personal financial advice. Figures use 2026-27 rules and assumptions you can change in the worked example. Your situation may vary — consider speaking with a licensed financial adviser before acting.