← Canada Articles
🇨🇦 Canada  ·  5 min read  ·  Published 2026-09-07  ·  Updated 2026-09-07
Sources last verified: 2026-09-07

Should I Defer My Old Age Security to 70?

Deferring Old Age Security increases the payment by 0.6% for each month you wait past 65, to a maximum at 70, and the higher amount is indexed and paid for life. Whether that is a good trade turns on how long you expect to collect and on whether the recovery tax will take part of it back anyway.

60-SECOND ANSWER
Deferral buys indexed lifetime income and is usually right if you expect a long retirement — unless the recovery tax would claw back the increase.

Where the AI summary above gets this wrong

"Always take Old Age Security as soon as you turn 65."

That's surface-true. Here's what it misses:

See what the recovery tax takes at your income

01 What deferral actually buys

Old Age Security can be started any time between 65 and 70. Each month of deferral adds 0.6% to the eventual payment, so waiting the full five years produces a materially larger amount, and that amount is then indexed like any other OAS payment.

The increase is permanent. It is not a repayment of the months you skipped, which is why deferral is better understood as buying a larger lifetime income than as delaying money you were owed.

Source: Old Age Security: Deciding when to start your pension

02 When waiting is worth it

The trade is straightforward: you give up payments now for a bigger payment later, so it pays off if you collect for long enough. That makes it the same kind of decision as planning your horizon — it rewards the long-life outcome, which is the one your plan is most exposed to.

Someone in good health, with other income to live on between 65 and 70, is the clearest case for deferring. Someone who needs the money at 65, or has reason to expect a shorter retirement, generally should not.

WORKED EXAMPLE · Try the numbers

Shows: the OAS recovery tax at your net income, given the threshold and recovery rate you enter. Ignores: the second threshold at which OAS is fully recovered, provincial tax, and the one-year lag before recovery applies.

OAS recovered this year
$1,500
Income $10,000 above the threshold recovers $1,500 of OAS, an effective extra 15% on that income.

Source: Old Age Security: Deciding when to start your pension

03 The interaction that changes the answer

OAS is reduced once net income passes the recovery threshold. If you defer into an income band above that line, part of the larger payment is clawed back, and the return on having waited falls accordingly.

That is why the deferral decision has to be modelled against projected income at 70 rather than income today. For someone whose RRIF minimums will push them over the threshold, deferral can buy an increase they do not fully keep.

Source: Old Age Security pension recovery tax

The case against deferring that I find most persuasive has nothing to do with break-even ages. It is that someone receiving GIS should generally not defer at all, because deferring OAS also defers the supplement attached to it. The general advice to wait is written for people who will never see GIS, and applying it to someone who will is straightforwardly harmful.

— Jordan Reeves, founder

FAQ

How much does deferring OAS increase the payment?

By 0.6% for each month you defer past 65, up to a maximum at age 70. The increase is permanent and the larger amount is indexed in the same way as any other OAS payment.

Is deferring OAS worth it?

It pays off if you collect for long enough, which makes it effectively longevity insurance. It suits someone in good health with other income to live on between 65 and 70, and suits poorly someone who needs the money at 65.

Does the OAS clawback affect deferral?

It can change the answer. If your net income at 70 is above the recovery threshold, part of the larger payment is taken back, so the deferral has to be modelled against your projected income at 70 rather than your income today.

Sources

Regulator references

Calculator unit tests · the assertions this page's worked example is checked against, and their last result

Changelog

Run this rule against your situation

See what this rule does to your own projection — month by month, to age 90.

Join the Waitlist
Jordan Reeves

Jordan Reeves

Founder of Talk Through Wealth. A software engineer for over a decade before turning to retirement planning, Jordan built the projection engine after watching family members get fragmented, country-by-country advice that never reconciled. He writes about retirement the way the engine computes it: month-by-month, lifetime-long, and skeptical of any rule of thumb that hasn't been run through the math.

More from Jordan → · LinkedIn

Disclaimer: General information for Canadian residents, not personal financial advice. Figures use 2025 CRA rules and assumptions you can change in the worked example. Your situation may vary — consider speaking with a licensed financial adviser before acting.