How should you phase gradually into retirement?
Stopping gradually is financially better than stopping abruptly, and the gap is larger than most people expect. Part-time work keeps contributions running, delays the first withdrawal, preserves the National Insurance record and shortens the bridge to the State Pension — four effects that compound against the single effect of a lower salary.
- Contributions: continue at a reduced level, with any employer match still in play.
- Withdrawals: start later or smaller, which is where sequence risk is highest.
- The record: part-time earnings above the lower earnings limit still buy a qualifying year.
- The bridge: every year worked is a year the portfolio does not have to fund in full.
Tom went to three days a week at 56 rather than stopping at 58, and it added four years to how long his SIPP is projected to last. The salary he gave up was not the point.
01 Why the effects compound
Part-time work does four things at once. Contributions continue, so the pot keeps growing. Withdrawals are delayed or reduced, so the pot is not being drained at the same time. The bridge to State Pension age shortens by every year worked. And the National Insurance record continues.
Each of those is worth something on its own, and they multiply rather than add — the pot grows for longer and is drawn on for less time, which is the same lever pulled from both ends.
Against them sits a smaller salary, which reduces contributions but does not eliminate them. For most people the arithmetic is not close: reducing hours for six years beats stopping three years early by a wide margin.
The comparison people should run is not part-time against full-time, it is part-time against full retirement. Three days a week at 56 to 62 against stopping entirely at 58 involves a similar amount of remaining work, and the phased version leaves the pot substantially larger while shortening the bridge by four years. That is the arithmetic that usually decides it.
Shows: the pot after a period of part-time work against the same period of full retirement. Ignores: tax, inflation, the State Pension, and any employer contribution change.
On the defaults above, the worked example shows £234,542. After 6 years the phased pot is £508,414 against £273,872 — and the State Pension is that much closer.
Source: Plan your retirement income
02 The National Insurance point
A qualifying year requires earnings at or above the lower earnings limit, not full-time work. Part-time earnings that clear that threshold buy a complete qualifying year, worth about £358 a year of State Pension for life at the current full rate.
That matters most for anyone short of 35 qualifying years, which includes a large number of people with career breaks. Reading the forecast before choosing a retirement date is what turns this from a general point into a specific number.
Where earnings fall below the threshold, the year does not count at all — so a very small amount of work can be worse than a slightly larger amount, which is a cliff rather than a taper.
Source: National Insurance: introduction
03 Making it work with the employer
The obstacle is usually the employer rather than the arithmetic, and it is worth asking before assuming. Employees with 26 weeks' service have a statutory right to request flexible working, and the employer has to deal with the request reasonably.
The negotiation that matters is about the employer pension contribution and any matching, which is usually pro-rated but occasionally protected. Confirming that before agreeing new terms avoids an unwelcome discovery on the first reduced payslip.
Where the current employer will not accommodate it, consultancy or contract work at the same skill level often will — and irregular income has its own pension pattern rather than being an obstacle to contributing.
04 The tax shape of a phased year
A part-time salary plus a modest pension withdrawal can be structured to use the personal allowance and stay inside the basic rate band, which is far more efficient than a large final salary followed by large withdrawals.
The trap is the money purchase annual allowance: taking taxable pension income while still contributing caps future contributions at £10,000 permanently. Taking tax-free cash instead, or a small pots lump sum, leaves the allowance intact.
So the sequence in a phased retirement is usually salary first, tax-free cash second, and taxable pension income only once contributions have genuinely stopped.
There is a further advantage in a phased year that people underuse. A reduced salary leaves room under the higher-rate threshold, so a pension contribution made in a part-time year attracts relief against income that would otherwise have been taxed at 40% in a full-time one — which partly offsets the lower earnings the contribution is made from.
05 What to decide first
Work out the bridge under both plans — stopping abruptly and reducing hours — because that comparison usually settles it on its own. Then check the National Insurance forecast, because a part-time year that fills a gap is worth more than its salary.
Then agree the terms, including what happens to the employer pension contribution, before the change takes effect. And avoid triggering the money purchase annual allowance until the contributions have actually stopped.
None of this requires a permanent decision. Reducing hours is reversible in a way that resigning is not, which is its own argument in a decision this large.
Ask about three days a week before you ask about stopping. The same total hours spread over more years is a completely different financial outcome, because the pot grows for longer and is drawn on for less — the same lever pulled from both ends. And a part-time year still buys a full qualifying year for the State Pension as long as the earnings clear the lower earnings limit, which surprises almost everyone. The obstacle is normally the employer, and most people never raise it because they assume the answer. Raise it.
FAQ
Does part-time work still count for the State Pension?
Yes, provided earnings reach the lower earnings limit for the year. A qualifying year is binary — once the threshold is met the year counts in full, regardless of how many days a week were worked.
Will my employer pension contribution continue?
Usually pro-rated to the reduced salary, and occasionally protected. It is the term worth confirming in writing before agreeing new hours, because it is easy to overlook and expensive to discover afterwards.
Can I take pension income while still working part time?
Yes, but taking taxable pension income triggers the money purchase annual allowance and caps future contributions at £10,000 permanently. Tax-free cash or a small pots lump sum avoids the trigger, so the sequence matters.
Do I have a right to reduce my hours?
Employees with 26 weeks' service have a statutory right to request flexible working, and the employer must deal with the request reasonably. That is a right to ask rather than a right to receive, but it is more than most people use.
Sources
Regulator references
- Plan your retirement income · GOV.UK · 2025The government's own sequence for turning pension pots into income.Last verified: 2026-09-07
- National Insurance: introduction · GOV.UK · 2025Which class of National Insurance applies to which kind of earnings.Last verified: 2026-09-07
- Workplace pensions: employer rules · GOV.UK · 2025The employer duties that decide what the reader is actually entitled to.Last verified: 2026-09-07
- Annual allowance on pension savings · GOV.UK · 2025The annual allowance, the money purchase allowance and how they interact.Last verified: 2026-09-07
- Check your State Pension forecast · GOV.UK · 2025The forecast service this post tells the reader to read before acting.Last verified: 2026-09-07
Calculator unit tests · the assertions this page's worked example is checked against, and their last result
Changelog
- 2026-09-07 — initial publish (new format)
Model this trade-off against your actual numbers
Run the strategy against your real super, income and timeline — month by month.
Join the Waitlist